Is Open-Source Code Really Examined for Security Any More Than Closed-Source Software?

Saturday, February 28, 2004 1:49:03 PM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

A very interesting article which you can read here at eWeek or download it in Word format below.

Is_Open_source_examined.doc (32 KB)

Linux desktop - success or disaster? Part 2

Monday, February 16, 2004 9:14:51 PM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

Munich is not enough. We have the same kind of example here in Finland - the city of Turku. It was nationwide reported that Turku is seriously going open-source. IBM made a study for Turku (objective or subjective, guess?) - you can download the report here (in finnish) IBM_Turku_selvitys.doc (415.5 KB). Conclusion of studies were that 60% of the departments in Turku were for IBM/Linux and 40% Microsoft. These figures were based on nothing as it turned out, read here. After 2 1/2 years of investigation they still do not know what to do and the majority is against IBM/Linux, read here.

You can also download the report made by Turku IT department - in finnish: Turku_linux.doc (177.5 KB) or in english: selvitys14082003.pdf (326.97 KB) - where the users are more for Microsoft Office, but the conclusion of the report is for Linux and OpenOffice.

My opinion is that Linux advocates hurt more themselves by not proving their claims. Discrediting others does not prove anything. Be open - as open-source - and tell honestly about positive and negative issues in Linux, get studies to support the claims.

I for one (as a Windows user) admit that Linux is a damn good server product, for that I give it credit. But on desktop - never in a million years. More usability, more user studies, include all the existing features that Windows has now and Linux might succeed. But it will take time.

Btw. Paris is trying to do the same mistake (read here) or just blackmailing Microsoft.

 

Linux desktop - success or disaster?

Monday, February 16, 2004 8:53:17 PM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

It is funny to notice how some news are reported, they of course depend of the news content and the purpose of the news, anyway it seems like it. We all remember how the Linux community celebrated the victory when the City of Munich decided to go open-source (read here). I could give couple of dozens of links to the same news story. It was big news that Linux won the big "bad" Microsoft.

What is the reality? That is not so much and widely reported as the original news. Linux is in trouble in Munich! What you haven't heard? Well read here or here. Paul Thurrott wrote about it already in July 2003.

"And speaking about Linux stories you don't hear much from the Linux-loving mainstream press, consider the following. Remember that story about the city of Munich choosing Linux to power 14,000 desktop computers? One aspect of this story that most people don't know about is that up to 80 percent of those Linux desktops will be equipped with VMWare, a virtual machine emulator, under which they will run Windows and Windows applications. That's right, folks: The majority of those "Linux desktops" will be used to run … Windows. I'm not a big fan of Gartner, but they've issued a report, correctly titled, "Munich's Choice Doesn't Prove Linux OK for General Desktop Use," that raises some interesting issues. First, many of the Windows desktops they're migrated are very old Windows versions like Windows 3.1, making the switch to Linux less painful (it would be equally painful to switch to XP). Gartner says the cost of switching to Linux will cost 30 million Euros, or 3 million Euros more than it would cost to switch to XP, not including any steep discounts Microsoft would have no doubt provided. And finally, because most of the Linux machines will use VMWare to run Windows anyway, Linux is really being used as a hosting environment, and not as a replacement. In other words, this isn't exactly a good business case on which other companies can base a decision to migrate to Windows desktops. And, not coincidentally, that's why we're not reading about a lot of other high-profile Linux switchers".

I will keep my eye on Munich and report when something is to be reported.

Datalens, neat calendar software for Outlook users

Monday, February 09, 2004 7:52:06 AM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

Take a look at Datalens. You can download it here and it is free.

3D reconstruction of Mars

Sunday, February 08, 2004 6:50:38 PM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

Cool, take a look here

Microsoft Has Right to Build Products the Way It Chooses

Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:46:02 PM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

A very interesting article. There is some comon sense behind it.
> Read here

Booble the Google!

Monday, February 02, 2004 7:24:04 PM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

Google has asked to owners of this search engine to close the site, because it violates Googles trademarks. Parody is parody, or is it? www.booble.com

How to drive the NASA Rover?

Sunday, February 01, 2004 1:48:38 PM (FLE Standard Time, UTC+02:00)

With this software the NASA engineers control and drive the Rover on Mars surface:

Click here for a larger image!